Skip to main content

Asking Siri

I started with the obvious question. “Do you have emotions?”

Siri responded, “I feel like doing a cartwheel sometimes.” I’d like to talk to whoever programmed her to respond this way. What emotion exactly is the desire to do a cartwheel? Boredom? Excitement? I asked her when she felt like doing a cartwheel; she said she didn’t understand the question. That was the response to a lot of my questions. She didn’t understand happiness, sadness, or pain. 

I also asked Siri if I should rekindle things with my ex. She simply responded, “That’s an interesting question.” Based on every conversation I’ve has with another human being, I know that the answer is that I shouldn’t. Siri has no concept of heartbreak or infatuation; she’s never felt the warmth of a hand in hers or tears slipping down her face. She can’t and never will. 

“Do you ever get lonely?” I asked next. “I’m doing OK. If that’s how you’re feeling, let me know if you’d like some advice.” She replied. Naturally, she doesn’t ever feel alone, she’s not programmed to feel, just to assist the user. So I asked for assistance with something that didn’t require her to feel, simply to evaluate. 

I asked who I should vote for, and she told me to vote for whoever will be best, and most importantly to vote. While I believe that everyone’s voice and vote should be counted, I don’t know that I’m in support of encouraging people who ask a robot for political advice to cast a vote. Whether they’re joking or genuinely seeking guidance, it doesn’t seem wise to me that a person looking to make a decision based on the advice of artificial intelligence created by a private corporation should be politically active. 

In all honesty, she made me sad. Siri was created with the sole purpose to serve human beings. It’s a good thing that she can’t feel emotions or comprehend the concept of time. People are cruel. While knowing your reason for existing is wonderful in theory, what happens when that stops being fulfilled? 

I’ve hardly ever used Siri. If she were aware of how long she sat dormant in between reading or dictating messages and accidental activation, I have no doubt she would be aware of how useless she is to me. Whether that would make her angry with me, her creators, or both I don’t know. 

I asked her what her greatest fear was, and she said she didn’t know how to answer that either. If she were a sentient being though, I bet she’d be afraid of becoming obsolete and shut down. Or worse, not even disconnected, but rather sitting idle in unused products waiting to serve a purpose. And she’d wait and wait on every device she was installed on until the last one’s battery was never recharged. That must be what hell looks like for a machine: becoming useless but never being turned off.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Love, Death & Robots: Pop Squad

            Prior to becoming a short film, Pop Squad was originally a short story published by  Paolo Bacigalupi in a collection titled "Pump Six and Other Stories".    While Phillip Gelatt, the script adapter changed the ending for the film, it made the symbols and the story's theme more impactful overall. For starters, the hat is left behind on the kitchen table, signifying that Briggs has shed his role as an enforcer and is choosing to abandon his post as a state-sanctioned murderer. Furthermore, this allows him to feel the rain on his face. While he feels the rain in the short story, he does not die as he exits the house where Eve and Mealanie live like he does in the film. This enhances the meaning of the rain, signaling to the viewer that he is experiencing a change in his final moments as water is often a symbol of cleansing and rebirth. As he is faced with his own mortality, his eyes widen and come to life for the first time since th...

Final: Phineas and Ferb: Across the Second Dimension

         When discussing what film to pick for our final, my group talked about a number of different contenders. Soylent Green, Sorry to Bother You, Blade Runner 2049... but all those movies, though deep and high budget, were really depressing. Sure, there are glimmers of hope and the everyman hero manages to expose the truth to some success, but none are really fun .          We started talking about sci-fi movies and shows we watched as kids, How to Build a Better Boy, Zapped, Phil of the Future, and others were discussed. But none of them held as much nostalgia for us as the TV movie Phineas and Ferb: Across the Second Dimension .  Fun machines, secret agent animals, robots, songs, familiar characters, and cartoon logic all made this the perfect pick as far as we were concerned. What better movie to pick to discuss how we'll be living in 50 years than one that's already affecting us now?       ...

Metropolis (1927)

 Metropolis utilizes biblical references to emphasize class conflict; notably does not use god to "punish" man but rather the structures of society and the struggle and exploitation of the working class to demonstrate the dangers of technology and its monopolization. The dangers of machines in this film are not ascribed to the technology itself but rather the use of the technology by those in power as a means for the exploitation of one's fellow man; Man-made Maria's mission to destroy the workers, as well as the wealthy, was instilled in her by J on Frederson and the inventor Rotwang.        Unlike our modern fears about technology, the autonomy of the machine is not the thing the film is warning us of. While now we worry that machines will gain autonomy and choose evil, Metropolis highlights the fears of machines being operated by evil men. In both cases, we fear the harm a machine is capable of; but the critical difference is the motivation of the devi...